Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Sterling (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Blatantly passes WP:MUSIC#C1. (non-admin closure) — neuro(talk) 00:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Nick Sterling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NMG. No improvement to the references since the last AFD, thereby calling notability into question. Stifle (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – I have now added several newspapers and magazines as sources. It seems this guitarist attracted a fair bit of attention for his musical ability at a young age. In addition to what I added, the following articles also appear to be about him, although I do not have access to the full text:
- "Who Needs Game Boy? This Kid Has Guitar", Arizona Republic, 2000-02-10, p. 48.
- "A Feel For Guitar", Arizona Republic, 2000-02-20, p. B3.
- Keep--Notability
- Keeps: Meets criteria #1 wp:music:"Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works."--Jmundo (talk) 03:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 11:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.